Kisan Diwas, observed every year on 23 December, marks the birth anniversary of former Prime Minister Chaudhary Charan Singh, a leader closely associated with farmers’ welfare. In Kisan Diwas 2025, the discussion around farmers’ issues is once again dominated by the Minimum Support Price (MSP) debate, making it highly relevant for civil services aspirants.
The MSP issue is not just about crop prices; it is deeply linked with rural livelihoods, food security, fiscal policy, federalism, and agricultural reforms. Understanding this debate is essential for a balanced UPSC answer.
Kisan Diwas is more than just a symbol. It shows:
The key role of farming in India's economy
The socio-political significance of farmers
The ongoing difficulties in agrarian reforms
Even in 2025, farming supports a lot of people, so taking care of farmers is an important part of running the country.
The government sets a minimum support price (MSP) for certain crops and promises to buy them from farmers if the market price falls below this level.
The goal is to:
Keep prices stable for farmers
Make sure you get paid back
Help grow important crops
The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs and the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) both support MSP.
MSP is now available for 23 crops, such as:
Cereals: wheat, rice, corn
Pulses: gram, tur, moong
Oilseeds: mustard, soybeans
Commercial crops: cotton and sugarcane through FRP
But good procurement is mostly limited to rice and wheat.
Farmers' costs are going up because of:
Fertilizers and pesticides that cost a lot
The cost of diesel and electricity is going up
Crop losses due to climate change
A lot of farmers say that MSP doesn't accurately show the real costs of inputs.
One of the main things that farmer unions want is:
Statutory support for MSP, which makes it legally binding
Farmers are worried that MSP is just a policy announcement and not a real safety net without legal protection.
What really happens on the ground:
Only 6–7% of farmers get direct benefits from MSP procurement
Small and marginal farmers often sell for less than MSP
The imbalance in the region favors Punjab, Haryana, and western UP
This makes people wonder about fairness and inclusion.
The government has always said that:
MSP is going up all the time
Over the years, the levels of procurement have gone up
MSP is guaranteed to be at least 1.5 times the cost of production (A2+FL)
It also says that:
MSP being legal could mess up markets
It might make the tax burden heavier
It might make farmers less likely to grow different kinds of crops
If MSP were legally binding for all crops, it would:
Raise the costs of government buying
Put more pressure on bills for food subsidies
Make fiscal deficits worse
This is a big problem for the stability of the economy as a whole.
A legal MSP might:
Lower the amount of private market participation
Push for too much MSP-backed crop production
Ignore signals of demand and supply
This could hurt the long-term efficiency of farming.
India is already having trouble with:
Too much rice and wheat farming
Depletion of groundwater
Soil damage
So a strict MSP system could make these problems worse.
MSP helps farmers get the price they want, but it can't double their income on its own.
Structural issues include:
Fragmented landholdings
Not very productive
Not being able to get to the market
Limited value addition
Focusing only on MSP ignores these deeper challenges.
Expansion of e-NAM
Better rural storage and logistics
Transparent price discovery mechanisms
This helps farmers get better prices beyond MSP.
MSP-like price support for pulses and oilseeds
Direct income support for diversification
Promotion of climate-resilient crops
This aligns farmer welfare with sustainability.
Schemes like PM-KISAN provide:
Income security without market distortion
Wider coverage compared to MSP
Such schemes can complement MSP effectively.
Kisan Diwas 2025 should move beyond symbolism and focus on:
Balanced MSP reforms
Sustainable agriculture
Farmer-centric governance
The MSP debate reflects a deeper trust deficit between farmers and policymakers that needs constructive dialogue.
A pragmatic solution may include:
Continuing MSP as a safety net
Improving procurement efficiency for non-cereal crops
Avoiding blanket legalisation
Strengthening market reforms and income support
UPSC expects nuanced answers—not binary positions.
The debate around MSP during Kisan Diwas 2025 highlights the complexities of Indian agriculture. MSP remains an important instrument, but it cannot be the sole solution to farmers’ distress. A mix of price support, income security, market reforms, and sustainable practices is essential.
For future administrators, the challenge lies in balancing farmer welfare, fiscal prudence, and environmental sustainability—not choosing one over the other.
1. Why is Kisan Diwas celebrated on 23 December?
It marks the birth anniversary of Chaudhary Charan Singh, a leader associated with agrarian reforms.
2. What is the main demand in the MSP debate?
Farmers demand a legal guarantee for MSP to ensure assured procurement.
3. Does MSP benefit all farmers equally?
No. Its benefits are regionally skewed and mainly limited to wheat and rice farmers.
4. Why is the government hesitant to legalise MSP?
Due to concerns about fiscal burden, market distortion, and crop imbalance.
5. How is this topic relevant for UPSC?
It covers GS Paper 3 (Agriculture, Economy), Essay Paper, and is relevant for interviews.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!